Optimizing Supplier Selection: Leveraging Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Purchasing Decision Support Systems

Authors

  • Fadhilatul Yusuf Hamizahrul Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Pontianak, Indonesia

Keywords:

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Purchasing Decisions, Supplier Selection, Decision Support Systems, Criteria Prioritization

Abstract

This research delves into the application and significance of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the domain of purchasing decisions, focusing on the structured methodology's impact on decision-making processes. The study seeks to explore how AHP serves as a robust decision support system, aiding in supplier selection, criteria prioritization, and overall procurement strategies. The research methodology involves a comprehensive analysis of AHP's implementation in the context of purchasing decisions. It encompasses a systematic review of literature, data collection methods including surveys and interviews with stakeholders, and the application of AHP models in evaluating and ranking suppliers based on identified criteria. Key findings underscore the pivotal role of AHP in structuring complex decisions by breaking them down into hierarchical structures. The research highlights AHP's ability to quantify criteria importance, integrate diverse stakeholder preferences, and prioritize suppliers based on overall performance across critical factors such as cost, quality, and delivery time. The outcomes of this study showcase the significant impact of AHP on enhancing decision quality, transparency, and resource optimization in purchasing decisions. The findings emphasize the methodology's adaptability to changing contexts and its role in fostering continuous improvement, aligning choices with organizational objectives, and mitigating risks associated with supplier selection.

References

Akmam Syed Zakaria, S., Gajendran, T., Rose, T., & Brewer, G. (2018). Contextual, structural and behavioural factors influencing the adoption of industrialised building systems: A review. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 14(1–2), 3–26.

Albayrak, E., & Erensal, Y. C. (2004). Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance: An application of multiple criteria decision making problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 15, 491–503.

Aspelin, J. (2012). How do relationships influence student achievement? Understanding student performance from a general, social psychological standpoint. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 22(1), 41–56.

Ayers, J. M., Huq, S., Faisal, A. M., & Hussain, S. T. (2014). Mainstreaming climate change adaptation into development: a case study of Bangladesh. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(1), 37–51.

Bérard, C., Cloutier, L. M., & Cassivi, L. (2017). The effects of using system dynamics-based decision support models: Testing policy-makers’ boundaries in a complex situation. Journal of Decision Systems, 26(1), 45–63.

Dabbish, L., Stuart, C., Tsay, J., & Herbsleb, J. (2012). Social coding in GitHub: transparency and collaboration in an open software repository. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1277–1286.

Demirkan, H., & Delen, D. (2013). Leveraging the capabilities of service-oriented decision support systems: Putting analytics and big data in cloud. Decision Support Systems, 55(1), 412–421.

Drumwright, M. E. (1994). Socially responsible organizational buying: Environmental concern as a noneconomic buying criterion. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 1–19.

Dweiri, F., Kumar, S., Khan, S. A., & Jain, V. (2016). Designing an integrated AHP based decision support system for supplier selection in automotive industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 62, 273–283.

Eichler, H., Kong, S. X., Gerth, W. C., Mavros, P., & Jönsson, B. (2004). Use of cost‐effectiveness analysis in health‐care resource allocation decision‐making: how are cost‐effectiveness thresholds expected to emerge? Value in Health, 7(5), 518–528.

Erdem, A. S., & Göçen, E. (2012). Development of a decision support system for supplier evaluation and order allocation. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(5), 4927–4937.

Graham, T. (2018). Platforms and hyper-choice on the World Wide Web. Big Data & Society, 5(1), 2053951718765878.

Janakiraman, V. S., & Sarukesi, K. (2008). Decision support systems. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.

Kawamoto, K., Houlihan, C. A., Balas, E. A., & Lobach, D. F. (2005). Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. Bmj, 330(7494), 765.

Mallat, N. (2007). Exploring consumer adoption of mobile payments–A qualitative study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16(4), 413–432.

McCue, C. P., & Pitzer, J. T. (2000). Centralized vs. decentralized purchasing: Current trends in governmental procurement practices. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 12(3), 400–420.

Organization, W. H. (2000). The world health report 2000: health systems: improving performance. World Health Organization.

Power, D. J. (2002). Decision support systems: concepts and resources for managers. Quorum Books.

Rehman, A. U., Al-Zabidi, A., AlKahtani, M., Umer, U., & Usmani, Y. S. (2020). Assessment of supply chain agility to foster sustainability: Fuzzy-DSS for a Saudi manufacturing organization. Processes, 8(5), 577.

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process. RACSAM-Revista de La Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales. Serie A. Matematicas, 102, 251–318.

Sauter, V. L. (2014). Decision support systems for business intelligence. John Wiley & Sons.

Shim, J. P., Warkentin, M., Courtney, J. F., Power, D. J., Sharda, R., & Carlsson, C. (2002). Past, present, and future of decision support technology. Decision Support Systems, 33(2), 111–126.

Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29.

Wagner, S. M., & Bode, C. (2006). An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 12(6), 301–312.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-28

How to Cite

Hamizahrul, F. Y. (2024). Optimizing Supplier Selection: Leveraging Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Purchasing Decision Support Systems. International Journal of Enterprise Modelling, 18(1), 11–21. Retrieved from https://ieia.ristek.or.id/index.php/ieia/article/view/84