Analysis of lora communication reliability using gnu radio in simulated LEO satellite channels

Authors

  • Muhammad Fathi Irfan Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Herwin Melyanus Hutapea Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Maulana Ali Arifin National Research and Innovation Agency, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Achmad Darwin Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, Bogor, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/int.jo.emod.v20i2.189

Keywords:

BER, GNU Radio, LoRa, SNR, Time on Air

Abstract

Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite communication using LoRa modulation faces persistent challenges including Doppler frequency shifts, free-space path loss, and synchronization instability that limit communication reliability for satellite-based Internet of Things (IoT) applications. Although LoRa has been widely adopted for terrestrial long-range communication, systematic Software-Defined Radio (SDR) evaluations of LoRa under LEO-like channel impairments remain scarce, particularly studies that simultaneously analyze multiple performance indicators across a complete Spreading Factor (SF) range. This study addresses that gap by proposing a reproducible GNU Radio-based SDR simulation framework that integrates LEO channel impairments (Doppler shift, free-space path loss, and atmospheric attenuation) and simultaneously evaluates Bit Error Rate (BER), Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), and Time on Air (ToA) for 24 SF–CR configurations (SF7–SF12 × CR4/5–CR4/8) at a fixed bandwidth of 125 kHz. The novelty of this work lies in the joint multi-metric SDR assessment of LoRa under satellite-like impairments and the identification of practical SF–CR operating points that balance reliability and efficiency for prospective LEO deployments. The results show that SF7 with CR4/6 and CR4/7 yields the most stable performance, achieving BER as low as 0.01, SNR around −8 to −9 dB, and ToA below 0.03 s, while configurations at SF11–SF12 exhibit severe BER degradation (≥ 0.86) and ToA up to 1.85 s due to synchronization sensitivity under Doppler-affected conditions. These findings provide quantitative guidance for parameter selection in LoRa-based LEO communication systems, particularly the RIDU-Sat development program in Indonesia.

References

Abdelhedi, M. A., Trabelsi, H., & Derbel, F. (2025). Performance Evaluation of LoRaWAN Physical Transmission Parameters. 2025 IEEE 22nd International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD), 1180–1185. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSD64182.2025.10989850

Akram, S. V., Singh, R., AlZain, M. A., Gehlot, A., Rashid, M., Faragallah, O. S., El-Shafai, W., & Prashar, D. (2021). Performance Analysis of IoT and Long-Range Radio-Based Sensor Node and Gateway Architecture for Solid Waste Management. Sensors, 21(8), 2774. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21082774

Ameloot, T., Van Torre, P., & Rogier, H. (n.d.). Experimental Parameter Optimization for Adaptive LoRa Modulation in Body-Centric Applications.

Arifn, M. A., & Khamsah, N. M. N. (2018). A Case Study in User Capacity Planning for Low Earth Orbit Communication Satellite. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Aerospace Electronics and Remote Sensing Technology (ICARES), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICARES.2018.8547056

Azhar Muzafar, M. I. Z., Mohd Ali, A., & Zulkifli, S. (2022). A Study on LoRa SX1276 Performance in IoT Health Monitoring. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6066354

Bagwari, S., Roy, A., Gehlot, A., Singh, R., Priyadarshi, N., & Khan, B. (2022). LoRa Based Metrics Evaluation for Real-Time Landslide Monitoring on IoT Platform. IEEE Access, 10, 46392–46407. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3169797

Ben Temim, M. A., Ferré, G., & Tajan, R. (2022). A New LoRa-like Transceiver Suited for LEO Satellite Communications. Sensors, 22(5), 1830. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22051830

Bor, M., & Roedig, U. (n.d.). LoRa Transmission Parameter Selection.

Courjault, J., Vrigneau, B., Berder, O., & Bhatnagar, M. R. (2020). How robust is a LoRa communication against impulsive noise? 2020 IEEE 31st Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/PIMRC48278.2020.9217348

Faber, M. J., van der Zwaag, K. M., dos Santos, W. G. V., Rocha, H. R. de O., Segatto, M. E. V., & Silva, J. A. L. (2020). A Theoretical and Experimental Evaluation on the Performance of LoRa Technology. IEEE Sensors Journal, 20(16), 9480–9489. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.2987776

Fadilah, N., Arifin, M. A., Qonita, A. H., Najati, N., Pratomo, B., Dwiyanto, & Nasser, E. N. (2022). Link and Doppler Analysis for LEO Constellation Space-Based IoT. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Aerospace Electronics and Remote Sensing Technology (ICARES), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICARES56907.2022.9993541

Fernandez, L., Ruiz-De-Azua, J. A., Calveras, A., & Camps, A. (2020). Assessing LoRa for satellite-to-earth communications considering the impact of ionospheric scintillation. IEEE Access, 8, 165570–165582. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3022433

Fraire, J. A., Céspedes, S., & Accettura, N. (2019). Direct-To-Satellite IoT - A Survey of the State of the Art and Future Research Perspectives (pp. 241–258). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31831-4_17

Guo, Q., Yang, F., & Wei, J. (2021). Experimental Evaluation of the Packet Reception Performance of LoRa. Sensors, 21(4), 1071. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041071

Ismail, I. S., Latiff, N. A. A., Ali, N. A. A., & Latiff, N. M. A. (2019). Performance Evaluation Of Physical Layer Using Lora Technology For Indoor Environment. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, 8(09). www.ijstr.org

LoRa® and LoRaWAN®. (2024).

N. Sornin. (2015). LoRa Specification 2 NOTICE OF USE AND DISCLOSURE 5.

Nubatonis, M. S. D., Lami, H. F. J., & Pella, S. I. (n.d.). KUALITAS SINYAL DAN KINERJA JARINGAN DATA ANTAR LORA GATEWAY RFM95.

Ortiz-Gomez, F. G., Martínez, R., Salas-Natera, M. A., Cornejo, A., & Landeros-Ayala, S. (2020). Correction: Ortiz-Gomez, F.G. et al. Forward Link Optimization for the Design of VHTS Satellite Networks. Electronics 2020, 9, 473. Electronics, 9(5), 737. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9050737

Pires, L., & Martins, J. (2024). Experimental Investigation of Spreading Factor, Payload Length and Collision Effects in LoRaWAN Radio Interface. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.1408.v1

Rivera Guzmán, E. F., Mañay Chochos, E. D., Chiliquinga Malliquinga, M. D., Baldeón Egas, P. F., & Toasa Guachi, R. M. (2022). LoRa Network-Based System for Monitoring the Agricultural Sector in Andean Areas: Case Study Ecuador. Sensors, 22(18), 6743. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22186743

Tempiem, P., & Silapunt, R. (2024). Enhancing Spreading Factor Assignment in LoRaWAN with a Geometric Distribution Approach for Practical Node Distributions. Telecom, 5(4), 941–960. https://doi.org/10.3390/telecom5040047

Turcinovic, F., Vukovic, J., Bozo, S., & Sisul, G. (2020). Analysis of LoRa Parameters in Real-World Communication. 2020 International Symposium ELMAR, 87–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/ELMAR49956.2020.9219028

Wijesuriya, W. A. S. (2025). Optimizing Spreading Factor Selection for Mobile LoRa Gateways Using Single-Channel Hardware. http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.19938

Zhang, C., Peng, H., Ji, Y., Hong, T., & Zhang, G. (2025). Adaptive Resource Optimization for LoRa-Enabled LEO Satellite IoT System in High-Dynamic Environments. Sensors, 25(11), 3318. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25113318

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Irfan, M. F., Hutapea, H. M., Arifin, M. A., & Darwin, A. (2026). Analysis of lora communication reliability using gnu radio in simulated LEO satellite channels. International Journal of Enterprise Modelling, 20(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.35335/int.jo.emod.v20i2.189

Most read articles by the same author(s)