Enhancing Scholarship Recipient Selection: A Fuzzy Logic-Based Decision Support System Utilizing the Tsukamoto Method
Keywords:
Decision Support System, Scholarship Recipient Selection, Fuzzy Logic, Tsukamoto Method, Evaluation FrameworkAbstract
Cholarship recipient selection stands as a critical yet challenging process, often constrained by traditional methods reliant on rigid criteria that struggle to encompass the diverse talents and achievements of applicants. This research introduces a novel Decision Support System (DSS) empowered by fuzzy logic and the Tsukamoto method to revolutionize this selection process. The DSS transcends the limitations of conventional methods by accommodating imprecise data, embracing a holistic evaluation framework that considers multifaceted criteria such as academic performance, extracurricular activities, and personal attributes. Leveraging fuzzy rules and linguistic variables, the system navigates uncertainty, fostering fairness, and transparency in decision-making. Rigorously tested for efficiency, accuracy, and reliability, the DSS emerges as a transformative tool, redefining scholarship selection paradigms. This research not only presents a cutting-edge system but also sets a precedent for advanced decision support systems, marking a shift towards more inclusive, adaptable, and precise evaluation methodologies.
References
Abdulgader, M. M. (2019). Bio Inspired Evolutionary Fuzzy System for Data Classification. The University of Toledo.
Alali, M., Almogren, A., Hassan, M. M., Rassan, I. A. L., & Bhuiyan, M. Z. A. (2018). Improving risk assessment model of cyber security using fuzzy logic inference system. Computers & Security, 74, 323–339.
Arfi, B. (2010). Linguistic fuzzy logic methods in social sciences (Vol. 253). Springer.
Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Shoho, A. (2002). An Exploratory Analysis of Leadership Preparation Selection Criteria.
Carnevale, A. P., & Rose, S. (2013). Socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, and selective college admissions.
Celikyilmaz, A., & Turksen, I. B. (2009). Modeling uncertainty with fuzzy logic. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, 240(1), 149–215.
Cousans, F., Patterson, F., Edwards, H., Walker, K., McLachlan, J. C., & Good, D. (2017). Evaluating the complementary roles of an SJT and academic assessment for entry into clinical practice. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22, 401–413.
Demirkan, H., & Delen, D. (2013). Leveraging the capabilities of service-oriented decision support systems: Putting analytics and big data in cloud. Decision Support Systems, 55(1), 412–421.
Dungan, K. A. (2015). Religious architecture and borderland histories: Great kivas in the prehispanic Southwest, 1000 to 1400 CE. The University of Arizona.
Gray, R., Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. (2002). Rites of passage and the self‐immolation of academic accounting labour: an essay exploring exclusivity versus mutuality in accounting scholarship. Accounting Forum, 26(1), 1–30.
Hacking, I. (1979). What is logic? The Journal of Philosophy, 76(6), 285–319.
Heifetz, R. A., Kania, J. V, & Kramer, M. R. (2004). Leading boldly. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 2(3), 20–32.
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J. L., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature (Vol. 8). National Postsecondary Education Cooperative Washington, DC.
Lau, H.-H., Hsu, H.-Y., Acosta, S., & Hsu, T.-L. (2014). Impact of participation in extra-curricular activities during college on graduate employability: an empirical study of graduates of Taiwanese business schools. Educational Studies, 40(1), 26–47.
Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 123–152.
McNeill, D., McNeill, D., & Freiberger, P. (1994). Fuzzy logic: The revolutionary computer technology that is changing our world. Simon and Schuster.
Mihesuah, D. A., & Wilson, A. C. (2004). Indigenizing the academy: Transforming scholarship and empowering communities. U of Nebraska Press.
Mohemad, R., Hamdan, A. R., Othman, Z. A., & Noor, N. M. M. (2010). Decision support systems (DSS) in construction tendering processes. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1004.3260.
Siddique, N., & Siddique, N. (2014). Mathematics of Fuzzy Control. Intelligent Control: A Hybrid Approach Based on Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms, 57–93.
Stylios, C. D., & Groumpos, P. P. (1999). A soft computing approach for modelling the supervisor of manufacturing systems. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 26, 389–403.
Türksen, I. B. (2005). An ontological and epistemological perspective of fuzzy set theory. Elsevier.
Verma, S., Pant, M., & Snasel, V. (2021). A comprehensive review on NSGA-II for multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems. Ieee Access, 9, 57757–57791.
Ward, K. (2003). Faculty Service Roles and the Scholarship of Engagement. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. ERIC.
Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I. Information Sciences, 8(3), 199–249.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Herian Setya Rustanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
