Modeling and optimization of multi-altitude leo satellite networks using cox point processes
Towards efficient coverage and performance analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/emod.v17i1.71Keywords:
Cox point processes, Modeling, Multi-altitude LEO satellite networks, Optimization, Performance analysisAbstract
This research focuses on the modeling and optimization of multi-altitude Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite networks using Cox point processes to achieve efficient coverage and performance analysis. LEO satellite networks have gained attention for their potential to provide global connectivity with reduced latency and increased network capacity. Accurately modeling the spatial distribution of satellites at different altitudes and optimizing their deployment pose significant challenges. This research proposes a mathematical framework based on Cox point processes to capture the randomness and irregularity of satellite deployments. Optimization algorithms, such as genetic algorithms, are employed to determine the optimal satellite locations, altitude allocation, and network parameters. Performance analysis considers metrics such as coverage probability, signal strength, interference levels, capacity, and quality of service. The research contributes to the development of advanced modeling techniques, optimization algorithms, and performance analysis frameworks, enabling efficient coverage and performance optimization in multi-altitude LEO satellite networks. The numerical examples and discussions illustrate the effectiveness and potential of the proposed approach in enhancing the design and operation of satellite communication systems
References
Abdu, T. S., Kisseleff, S., Lagunas, E., & Chatzinotas, S. (2021). Flexible resource optimization for GEO multibeam satellite communication system. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 20(12), 7888–7902.
Arum, S. C., Grace, D., & Mitchell, P. D. (2020). A review of wireless communication using high-altitude platforms for extended coverage and capacity. Computer Communications, 157, 232–256.
Bondur, V., Dulov, V., Kozub, V., Murynin, A., Yurovskaya, M., & Yurovsky, Y. (2022). Validation of the satellite method for measuring spectra of spatially inhomogeneous sea waves. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(10), 1510.
Çelikbilek, K., Saleem, Z., Morales Ferre, R., Praks, J., & Lohan, E. S. (2022). Survey on optimization methods for leo-satellite-based networks with applications in future autonomous transportation. Sensors, 22(4), 1421.
Chaize, M. (2003). Enhancing the economics of satellite constellations via staged deployment and orbital reconfiguration. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Dunlop, M. W., Yang, J.-Y., Yang, Y.-Y., Lühr, H., & Cao, J.-B. (2020). Multi-spacecraft current estimates at Swarm. Ionospheric Multi-Spacecraft Analysis Tools: Approaches for Deriving Ionospheric Parameters, 83–116.
Gapeyenko, M., Moltchanov, D., Andreev, S., & Heath, R. W. (2021). Line-of-sight probability for mmWave-based UAV communications in 3D urban grid deployments. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 20(10), 6566–6579.
Gramacy, R. B. (2020). Surrogates: Gaussian process modeling, design, and optimization for the applied sciences. CRC press.
Hard, S. (2018). A Low-cost Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) Payload for Cubesats and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). West Virginia University.
Jia, M., Zhang, X., Gu, X., Guo, Q., Li, Y., & Lin, P. (2018). Interbeam interference constrained resource allocation for shared spectrum multibeam satellite communication systems. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(4), 6052–6059.
Jiang, D., Wang, F., Lv, Z., Mumtaz, S., Al-Rubaye, S., Tsourdos, A., & Dobre, O. (2021). QoE-aware efficient content distribution scheme for satellite-terrestrial networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 22(1), 443–458.
Jiang, H., Wang, H., Hu, Y., & Wu, J. (2022). Dynamic user association in scalable ultra-dense LEO satellite networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 71(8), 8891–8905.
Johnston, T., Young, S. R., Hughes, D., Patton, R. M., & White, D. (2017). Optimizing convolutional neural networks for cloud detection. In Proceedings of the machine learning on HPC environments (pp. 1–9).
Jourdan, D. B., & de Weck, O. L. (2004). Layout optimization for a wireless sensor network using a multi-objective genetic algorithm. 2004 IEEE 59th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC 2004-Spring (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37514), 5, 2466–2470.
Jung, D.-H., Ryu, J.-G., & Choi, J. (2022). When satellites work as eavesdroppers. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 17, 2784–2799.
Lunga, D., Yang, H. L., Reith, A., Weaver, J., Yuan, J., & Bhaduri, B. (2018). Domain-adapted convolutional networks for satellite image classification: A large-scale interactive learning workflow. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 11(3), 962–977.
Ma, F., Zhang, X., Li, X., Cheng, J., Guo, F., Hu, J., & Pan, L. (2020). Hybrid constellation design using a genetic algorithm for a LEO-based navigation augmentation system. GPS Solutions, 24, 1–14.
Markus, T., Neumann, T., Martino, A., Abdalati, W., Brunt, K., Csatho, B., Farrell, S., Fricker, H., Gardner, A., & Harding, D. (2017). The Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2): science requirements, concept, and implementation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 190, 260–273.
Mirza, M.-Y. M., & Khan, N. M. (2020). G2A Communication Channel Modeling and Characterization Using Confocal Prolates. Wireless Personal Communications, 115(1), 745–787.
Mozaffari, M., Saad, W., Bennis, M., Nam, Y.-H., & Debbah, M. (2019). A tutorial on UAVs for wireless networks: Applications, challenges, and open problems. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(3), 2334–2360.
Okati, N., & Riihonen, T. (2022). Nonhomogeneous stochastic geometry analysis of massive LEO communication constellations. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 70(3), 1848–1860.
Paek, S. W., Kim, S., & de Weck, O. (2019). Optimization of reconfigurable satellite constellations using simulated annealing and genetic algorithm. Sensors, 19(4), 765.
Price, A. R., Voutchkov, I. I., Pound, G. E., Edwards, N. R., Lenton, T. M., & Cox, S. J. (2006). Multiobjective tuning of grid-enabled earth system models using a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II). 2006 Second IEEE International Conference on E-Science and Grid Computing (e-Science’06), 117.
Ren, X., Chen, J., Zhang, X., Schmidt, M., Li, X., & Zhang, J. (2020). Mapping topside ionospheric vertical electron content from multiple LEO satellites at different orbital altitudes. Journal of Geodesy, 94, 1–17.
Renner, I. W., Elith, J., Baddeley, A., Fithian, W., Hastie, T., Phillips, S. J., Popovic, G., & Warton, D. I. (2015). Point process models for presence‐only analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 6(4), 366–379.
Ruan, Y., Li, Y., Wang, C.-X., Zhang, R., & Zhang, H. (2017). Outage performance of integrated satellite-terrestrial networks with hybrid CCI. IEEE Communications Letters, 21(7), 1545–1548.
Running, S. W., Baldocchi, D. D., Turner, D. P., Gower, S. T., Bakwin, P. S., & Hibbard, K. A. (1999). A global terrestrial monitoring network integrating tower fluxes, flask sampling, ecosystem modeling and EOS satellite data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 70(1), 108–127.
Saeed, N., Almorad, H., Dahrouj, H., Al-Naffouri, T. Y., Shamma, J. S., & Alouini, M.-S. (2021). Point-to-point communication in integrated satellite-aerial 6G networks: State-of-the-art and future challenges. IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 2, 1505–1525.
Shaw, G. B. (1999). The generalized information network analysis methodology for distributed satellite systems. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Shen, B., Wu, Y., An, J., Xing, C., Zhao, L., & Zhang, W. (2022). Random access with massive MIMO-OTFS in LEO satellite communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 40(10), 2865–2881.
Shi, M., Yang, K., Niyato, D., Yuan, H., Zhou, H., & Xu, Z. (2022). The meta distribution of SINR in UAV-assisted cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 71(2), 1193–1206.
Sukhinov, A. I., Chistyakov, A. E., Leontyev, A. L., Nikitina, A. V., & Filina, A. A. (2020). Mathematical modeling of hydrophysical processes for water with complex bottom geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1479(1), 12083.
Tang, Q., Fei, Z., Li, B., & Han, Z. (2021). Computation offloading in LEO satellite networks with hybrid cloud and edge computing. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(11), 9164–9176.
Wang, R., Kishk, M. A., & Alouini, M.-S. (2022). Ultra-dense LEO satellite-based communication systems: A novel modeling technique. IEEE Communications Magazine, 60(4), 25–31.
Wang, X., Wu, G., Xing, L., & Pedrycz, W. (2020). Agile earth observation satellite scheduling over 20 years: Formulations, methods, and future directions. IEEE Systems Journal, 15(3), 3881–3892.
Yang, Q., Laurenson, D. I., & Barria, J. A. (2012). On the use of LEO satellite constellation for active network management in power distribution networks. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 3(3), 1371–1381.
Zhu, X., Jiang, C., Kuang, L., Ge, N., & Lu, J. (2017). Non-orthogonal multiple access based integrated terrestrial-satellite networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 35(10), 2253–2267.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Titus Gramacy Zhu, Shi-soon Solosa, Periera Maniani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
