An Integrated Approach for Optimizing Production Planning Decisions: Hybrid Grid Partitioning, Rough Set Analysis, and Fuzzy Rule Generation for Enhanced Efficiency and Decision-Making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/emod.v15i1.40Keywords:
Production planning optimization, Hybrid grid partitioning, Rough set analysis, Fuzzy rule generation, Decision-making efficiencyAbstract
This research presents an integrated approach for optimizing production planning decisions by combining hybrid grid partitioning, rough set analysis, and fuzzy rule generation. The aim is to enhance efficiency and decision-making in the production planning process. The proposed approach addresses the complexities and uncertainties of real-world production environments by providing a comprehensive framework for decision support. The integrated approach begins with hybrid grid partitioning, which offers a structured representation of the decision space. This enables systematic exploration and analysis of different decision variables and their combinations. The subsequent application of rough set analysis reduces the dimensionality of the problem by identifying essential attributes, simplifying the decision-making process and focusing on the most relevant factors. To capture expert knowledge and facilitate adaptive decision-making, fuzzy rule generation is employed. Decision rules based on linguistic terms are generated, allowing for flexible adjustments to production quantities based on linguistic conditions such as demand levels. The combined use of these methodologies provides a holistic and comprehensive framework for optimizing production planning decisions. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the integrated approach, a numerical example is presented. The results indicate that the approach successfully determines optimal production quantities while minimizing production costs, considering capacity constraints, demand requirements, and resource utilization. The integrated approach shows promise in enhancing operational efficiency, improving resource utilization, and aligning with customer demand. The research acknowledges certain limitations, such as simplified assumptions, data availability, and computational complexity. Further validation studies and customization for specific industries are necessary to ensure the practical applicability of the integrated approach. The integrated approach offers a valuable contribution to the field of production planning optimization. By combining multiple methodologies and addressing the complexities of real-world production environments, the approach enhances decision-making and provides a practical framework for organizations seeking to optimize their production processes. Future research directions may focus on addressing the identified limitations and further validating the approach in diverse industrial settings.
References
Aliev, R. A., Fazlollahi, B., Guirimov, B. G., & Aliev, R. R. (2007). Fuzzy-genetic approach to aggregate production–distribution planning in supply chain management. Information Sciences, 177(20), 4241-4255.
Ascough Ii, J. C., Maier, H. R., Ravalico, J. K., & Strudley, M. W. (2008). Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making. Ecological modelling, 219(3-4), 383-399.
Aytug, H., Lawley, M. A., McKay, K., Mohan, S., & Uzsoy, R. (2005). Executing production schedules in the face of uncertainties: A review and some future directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 161(1), 86-110.
Ballard, H. G. (2000). The last planner system of production control (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham).
Camargo, V. C., Toledo, F. M., & Almada-Lobo, B. (2014). HOPS–Hamming-Oriented Partition Search for production planning in the spinning industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 234(1), 266-277.
Chang, N. B., & Wang, S. F. (1997). A fuzzy goal programming approach for the optimal planning of metropolitan solid waste management systems. European journal of operational research, 99(2), 303-321.
Figueira, G., Santos, M. O., & Almada-Lobo, B. (2013). A hybrid VNS approach for the short-term production planning and scheduling: A case study in the pulp and paper industry. Computers & Operations Research, 40(7), 1804-1818.
Fumero, F., & Vercellis, C. (1999). Synchronized development of production, inventory, and distribution schedules. Transportation science, 33(3), 330-340.
Garetti, M., & Taisch, M. (2012). Sustainable manufacturing: trends and research challenges. Production planning & control, 23(2-3), 83-104.
Gary, M. S., & Wood, R. E. (2011). Mental models, decision rules, and performance heterogeneity. Strategic management journal, 32(6), 569-594.
Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Journal of cleaner production, 98, 66-83.
Graves, S. C. (1999). Manufacturing planning and control. Massachusetts institute of technology, 1-26.
Guide Jr, V. D. R. (2000). Production planning and control for remanufacturing: industry practice and research needs. Journal of operations Management, 18(4), 467-483.
Gunasekaran, A. (1999). Agile manufacturing: a framework for research and development. International journal of production economics, 62(1-2), 87-105.
Hassanien, A. E., Abraham, A., Peters, J. F., Schaefer, G., & Henry, C. (2009). Rough sets and near sets in medical imaging: A review. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 13(6), 955-968.
Hilletofth, P., Sequeira, M., & Adlemo, A. (2019). Three novel fuzzy logic concepts applied to reshoring decision-making. Expert systems with applications, 126, 133-143.
Jacobs, F. R., Berry, W. L., Whybark, D. C., & Vollmann, T. E. (2011). Manufacturing planning and control for supply chain management: APICS/CPIM Certification Edition. McGraw-Hill Education.
Jensen, R., & Shen, Q. (2004). Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction: rough and fuzzy-rough-based approaches. IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 16(12), 1457-1471.
Jensen, R., & Shen, Q. (2008). Computational intelligence and feature selection: rough and fuzzy approaches.
Kahraman, C., Ertay, T., & Büyüközkan, G. (2006). A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach. European journal of operational research, 171(2), 390-411.
Kang, X. (2020). Aesthetic product design combining with rough set theory and fuzzy quality function deployment. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 39(1), 1131-1146.
Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., ... & Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability science, 7, 25-43.
Li, S., & Li, J. Z. (2010). AgentsInternational: Integration of multiple agents, simulation, knowledge bases and fuzzy logic for international marketing decision making. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(3), 2580-2587.
Lin, J. T., & Chen, C. M. (2015). Simulation optimization approach for hybrid flow shop scheduling problem in semiconductor back-end manufacturing. Simulation modelling practice and theory, 51, 100-114.
Malczewski, J. (2019). Spatial multicriteria decision analysis. In Spatial multicriteria decision making and analysis (pp. 11-48). Routledge.
Maravelias, C. T. (2012). General framework and modeling approach classification for chemical production scheduling. AIChE Journal, 58(6), 1812-1828.
Maravelias, C. T., & Sung, C. (2009). Integration of production planning and scheduling: Overview, challenges and opportunities. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 33(12), 1919-1930.
McBratney, A. B., & Odeh, I. O. (1997). Application of fuzzy sets in soil science: fuzzy logic, fuzzy measurements and fuzzy decisions. Geoderma, 77(2-4), 85-113.
Mitra, S., & Hayashi, Y. (2000). Neuro-fuzzy rule generation: survey in soft computing framework. IEEE transactions on neural networks, 11(3), 748-768.
Mönch, L., Fowler, J. W., & Mason, S. J. (2012). Production planning and control for semiconductor wafer fabrication facilities: modeling, analysis, and systems (Vol. 52). Springer Science & Business Media.
Mula, J., Poler, R., García-Sabater, J. P., & Lario, F. C. (2006). Models for production planning under uncertainty: A review. International journal of production economics, 103(1), 271-285.
Nguyen, H. T., Md Dawal, S. Z., Nukman, Y., Aoyama, H., & Case, K. (2015). An integrated approach of fuzzy linguistic preference based AHP and fuzzy COPRAS for machine tool evaluation. PloS one, 10(9), e0133599.
Qian, Y., Liang, J., Pedrycz, W., & Dang, C. (2010). Positive approximation: an accelerator for attribute reduction in rough set theory. Artificial intelligence, 174(9-10), 597-618.
Romiszowski, A. J. (2016). Designing instructional systems: Decision making in course planning and curriculum design. Routledge.
Saaty, T. L. (2001). Decision making for leaders: the analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world. RWS publications.
Seraji, H., & Howard, A. (2002). Behavior-based robot navigation on challenging terrain: A fuzzy logic approach. IEEE transactions on robotics and automation, 18(3), 308-321.
Shen, W., Wang, L., & Hao, Q. (2006). Agent-based distributed manufacturing process planning and scheduling: a state-of-the-art survey. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 36(4), 563-577.
Sun, C. C. (2010). A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert systems with applications, 37(12), 7745-7754.
Suo, M., Tao, L., Zhu, B., Chen, Y., Lu, C., & Ding, Y. (2020). Soft decision-making based on decision-theoretic rough set and Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy model with application to the autonomous fault diagnosis of satellite power system. Aerospace Science and Technology, 106, 106108.
Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Précis of simple heuristics that make us smart. Behavioral and brain sciences, 23(5), 727-741.
Uzsoy, R., Lee, C. Y., & Martin-Vega, L. A. (1992). A review of production planning and scheduling models in the semiconductor industry part I: system characteristics, performance evaluation and production planning. IIE transactions, 24(4), 47-60.
Varma, V. A., Reklaitis, G. V., Blau, G. E., & Pekny, J. F. (2007). Enterprise-wide modeling & optimization—An overview of emerging research challenges and opportunities. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 31(5-6), 692-711.
Vidal, C. J., & Goetschalckx, M. (1997). Strategic production-distribution models: A critical review with emphasis on global supply chain models. European journal of operational research, 98(1), 1-18.
Vieira, G. E., Herrmann, J. W., & Lin, E. (2003). Rescheduling manufacturing systems: a framework of strategies, policies, and methods. Journal of scheduling, 6, 39-62.
Vluymans, S., D'eer, L., Saeys, Y., & Cornelis, C. (2015). Applications of Fuzzy Rough Set Theory in Machine Learning: a Survey. Fundam. Informaticae, 142(1-4), 53-86.
Yeh, C. C., Chi, D. J., & Lin, Y. R. (2014). Going-concern prediction using hybrid random forests and rough set approach. Information Sciences, 254, 98-110.
Zadeh, L. A. (1997). Toward a theory of fuzzy information granulation and its centrality in human reasoning and fuzzy logic. Fuzzy sets and systems, 90(2), 111-127.
Zhong, R. Y., Huang, G. Q., Lan, S., Dai, Q. Y., Chen, X., & Zhang, T. (2015). A big data approach for logistics trajectory discovery from RFID-enabled production data. International Journal of Production Economics, 165, 260-272.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ciência Yjensen DE Moreira Pomiszowski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
